Postmodern vs. Masonic Ethics – If It’s Not Illegal, Unethical or Immoral Just Do It!


I remember hearing fellow employees say, “Well, I am not going to do it; it’s not part of my job description.” As though everything we do in a job is part of a job description. In fact, for nearly twenty years, if my immediate boss wanted me to get him a cup of coffee, I did it. Upon reflection, when he wanted me to pick him up at the airport, I did it. When he wanted me to pick up his Gin, I did it. I could go on and on. The point of this month’s short article is the guiding Masonic principles of ethical behavior, like “Honor and Duty are the pole-stars of a Mason” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 96), which often stands in stark contrast to Postmodern ethical thinking.

Yet, it was not until I became a Freemason did I truly understand the words of my father, “If It’s Not Illegal, Unethical or Immoral just do it!” In other words, if a person, a company or even the Government is paying you a salary, which is nothing but buying your time, simply do your job without complaint. Pike confirmed such thinking when he wrote:

Duty is the moral magnetism which controls and guides the true Mason’s course over the tumultuous seas of life. Whether the stars of honour, reputation, and reward do or do not shine, in the light of day or in the darkness of the night of trouble and adversity, in calm or storm, that unerring magnet still shows him the true course to steer, and indicates with certainty where-away lies the port which not to reach involves shipwreck and dishonour. He follows its silent bidding, as the mariner, when land is for many days not in sight, and the ocean without path or landmark spreads out all around him, follows the bidding of the needle, never doubting that it points truly to the north. To perform that duty, whether the performance be rewarded or unrewarded, is his sole care. And it doth not matter, though of this performance there may be no witnesses, and though what he does will be forever unknown to all mankind (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 123.).

Indeed, there may be times when remaining silent is not an option; the most obvious being something maybe illegal. In the case of an illegality, the Mason is of course not required to do the task requested of him. Nevertheless, the legality of certain behaviors is constantly changing, especially in our society today. That is why it is important to stay on top of law and rule changes that apply to one’s life. I am reminded that my mother was first married when she was 14 years old – and yes it was legal in those days. Moreover, when I was young, the age of consent was 16 years of age; but today, the age of consent is 18. You see, laws are constantly changing.

Yet, even after reviewing the legality of an action or behavior, one still must address the ethics involved in such a behavior. Now, in the Postmodern world, the word ethics has a different meaning than in the Masonic world. I remember a discussion I had with a very intelligent individual. I told her that our ethical behavior was based on western religious values. This lady, who was proud of her intellect, immediately countered with the Postmodern diatribe that one can be a good and ethical person without religious values – that religion was in no way associated with ethical behavior. In short, she drank the cool-aid she had been fed by her Postmodern college education. I simply asked her if she ever looked up the root meaning of ethics; she of course said no. We immediately went to a computer and discovered the following:

The Encyclopaedia Britannica explains that every society has an origin story with an accompanying code of ethics. One well-known example is that of Moses being presented with the Ten Commandments. For many in Western culture, these commandments have shaped their government and system of law. What separates the civilized from the uncivilized in history is system and code to live by. Few would consider cavemen lifestyle as an outline for how to construct a system of government, but looking to Plato’s Republic, written in 380 B.C., is reasonable.

The modern world has a much more complicated look at ethics than older societies. This complexity can be understood by our expanded understanding of the natural world. Pëtr Kroptkin, a Russian philosopher, tried to look at and assess human behavior apart from ethics. If humans were to act without concern for ethics, we would act solely to serve ourselves. With ethics, modern society can operate in cooperative manner, allowing those with more resources to assist those without. While the origin of ethics remains unclear, it is well agree that without it, humanity would work in a vastly different manner.

You see, whether an individual is religious or not, many of our social and ethical norms are governed by and are based on our western religious values, “The word ‘ethics’ is ‘commonly used interchangeably with ‘morality,’ and sometimes it is used more narrowly to mean the moral principles of a particular tradition, group, or individual.'” Yes, much of it is Christian, but let me educate the reader about something not seldom mentioned – Christianity grew out of Judaism; as well, it quickly adapted to social changes that took place after the death of Christ. And Christ himself simply taught ideas that originated from Egypt and the east, under other religious systems. Interestingly, most of the ancient world, which is the foundation of our ethical behavior today, was itself based on some type of religious belief. Therefore, the foundation of our ethical behavior today has its origins based on religious values and behavior. So much for the Postmodern notion that ethical behavior has nothing to do with our religious past.

And lastly, the issue of immoral behavior. This too is closely aligned with ethics; although, it is more closely aligned with religion. In truth, our moral behavior is synonymous with our religious past and is a guiding us, even today:

Morality (from the Latin moralitas “manner, character, proper behavior”) is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper. Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion, or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal. Morality may also be specifically synonymous with “goodness” or “rightness.”…  An example of normative ethical philosophy is the Golden Rule, which states that: “One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.”

I know it sounds petty, and for some people getting a cup of coffee for a boss is considered demeaning. I will attempt to stay away of the gender angle; especially since most of Freemasonry is male in this country. My boss was a male and I was a male, and I did not find it demeaning in the least. I looked upon it based on what my father told me when I was young, “If it’s not Illegal, Unethical or Immoral just do it.” In fact, it is not uncommon for myself or one of my fellow Brothers to volunteer to serve either coffee, orange juice, or even wine when we refill our cup. In fact, the Grand Commander of Knights Templar in the state of California can be seen in our kitchen either making food or serving his food in our dinning room. You see, humility of a Masonic virtue.

Here is a short quote, which clearly defines the simple act of getting a boss a cup of coffee is not an illegal act:

After working for a few weeks, her (male) bosses asked her to get their coffee for them. She declined, and her manager e-mailed her, saying: “This is not open for debate. Please don’t make an easy task a big deal.” Klopfenstein felt that getting coffee “reinforced outdated gender stereotypes,” so the next day, when she was asked to get coffee again, she sent an e-mail that read: “I don’t expect to serve and wait on you by making and serving you coffee every day.” Nine minutes later, she was fired. Klopfenstein promptly sued the company for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The judge ruled: “The act of getting coffee is not, by itself, a gender-specific act,” and dismissed the case. But Klopfenstein’s attorneys argue that “Some tasks are inherently more offensive to women.”

Therefore, get over your Postmodern thinking and start acting like a Freemason; it is always better to give (serve) than receive (be served)!

So Mote It Be!

Hank Kraychir


Post-Postmodernism or Metamodernism and Freemasonry


As many of the followers of my blog have read over the past ten months, I have been delving into Postmodernism and its effect on the Craft. I know, especially in the beginning, many people commented that this subject had nothing to do with Freemasonry’s decline; comments I have dismissed. I dismissed them because these individuals have not studied this topic and have only lived a Postmodern life. Therefore, those who have predominately lived a Postmodern life would be more apt to accept such a life as reality. However, because I have studied the written works of both Albert Pike and Eliphias Levi, I know that there is an alternative reality; if one only looks hard enough, it can be seen. That is why I am now going to discuss the terms Post-Postmodernism or Metamodernism, which are vertically the same topic.

Post-Postmodernism can be defined as, “a wide-ranging set of developments in critical theory, philosophy, architecture, art, literature, and culture which are emerging from and reacting to postmodernism. Another similar recent term is metamodernism.” And Metamodernism, “is a set of developments in philosophy, aesthetics, and culture which are emerging from and reacting to postmodernism. One definition characterizes metamodernism as mediations between aspects of both modernism and postmodernism. Metamodernism is similar to post-postmodernism.”

You see, there is a merging of both Modernism and Postmodernism taking place. As I stated in an earlier blog posting on this topic, we will never actually be able to go back to Modernism, nor should we. In fact, we, as a culture, will blend our past, incorporating the good and leaving the bad elements behind.


There are, of course, differing scholastic opinions on this topic as well; nevertheless, there appears to be a broad consensus developing:

Consensus on what makes up an era can hardly be achieved while that era is still in its early stages. However, a common positive theme of current attempts to define post-postmodernism is that faith, trust, dialogue, performance and sincerity can work to transcend postmodern irony.

There is no doubt in my mind that Postmodernism has had a negative effect of the Craft; however, Post-Postmodernism or Metamodernism might be a turning point for Freemasonry? Only time will tell for sure. While reading the above quote, the words “faith, trust, dialogue, performance and sincerity” became a glaring contrast to the Postmodern society of no faith, mistrust, no dialogue, a lack of performance and a lack of sincerity.

What does a Post-Postmodern (Metamodern) society look like and why should we be hopeful in this transformation? Here is one optimistic view I thought you might find enjoyable:

We metamodernists stay true to the postmodern skepticism and ironic distancing from all attempts to tell “the one story” about in which direction society should be developed. But we also add a crucial ingredient that was present during modernity: hope and faith in progress. We believe that society truly has evolved and that positive developments are possible. Progress is real. Life invites us to greater possibilities. Possibilities, potentials, are always dangerous, but always real – and necessary. That is why metamodernism is based upon an invitation to a critical, self-reflexive dialogue about the future of society.

We have our own ideas about the future and we hold them without apology. We present them and break them against those of others. We distance ourselves from the excessive irony prevailing today; an irony we feel has an undercurrent of philosophical and political cowardice. We believe that metamodern society is born through risk taking, vulnerability and hope. Metamodern society is created through the political and cultural adventure, an adventure that requires passionate participation. To be a political metamodernist means to never settle for ironic distancing, to not be satisfied with “asking new questions”. Metamodernists also have an entrepreneurial or artistic side – we seek answers, or at least solutions. We recognize that these answers to the riddles of life and the problems of society cannot be final, but we always attempt to find the best possible answers and visions. We are prepared to put our “good names” at stake and to admit when we’ve been mistaken. We believe that is the right path ahead.

Political metamodernism can be described as “pragmatic idealism” or “informed naivety”.

I, of course, find this view right in line with Masonic instruction. Especially with regard to attempting to find the “riddles of life.” Think about it, is this not what Freemasonry is all about – YES, YES it is! Furthermore, here is a comparative list to help better define the topics of Modernism, Postmodernism and Metamodernism (Post-Postmodernism):

Modern ideas:

Postmodern ideas:

Metamodern ideas:

In conclusion, based on the goals of Metamodernism, I personally believe we have the making of a glorious return of Masonic teachings and instruction in the near future. Let us continue to work towards such an end and then we can look upon the past 40 to 50 years as a necessary purge; similar to the Anti-Masonic movement that started in 1824, which also lasted some 40 to 50 years!

So Mote It Be!

Hank Kraychir


Postmodern Millennials And Their Effect On The Craft


A dirty little outcome of Postmodernism has been its effect on the generation known as the Millennials.  This experiment in social reconstruction has had a devastating effect on this group of young adults; and by extension, the Craft itself. This short essay will attempt to give further insight into the topic of Postmodernism, an issue I have been writing about since January of this year; feel free to look at my blog for further writings.

Let me first define the term Millennials:

Millennials (also known as the Millennial Generation or Generation Y, abbreviated to Gen Y) are the demographic cohort between Generation X and Generation Z. There are no precise dates for when the generation starts and ends. Demographers and researchers typically use the early 1980s as starting birth years and use the mid-1990s to the early 2000s as final birth years for the Millennial Generation.

Interestingly, the Millennials are by far the most studied generation in American history; in fact, the United States Census Bureau claimed there are over 80 million of them. In terms of their strengths, they are by far the most savvy technological generation to date; however, as good as this might first sound, look closer. This generation that grew up with computers, cell phones, television and the Internet, also lacks certain social skills. In fact, they have also become known as the loner generation. Sadly, I have even witnessed this crisis first hand. I have gone to many social events where this generation would rather look into their cell phone than talk to their peers, let alone older adults. In a word, they have become “detached” from reality.


Moreover, Millennials are less caring, concerned little with community affairs and are less politically active than past generations, as Jean Twenge claimed, “today’s youth are more interested in extrinsic life goals and less concerned for others and civic engagement. They are described as overly self-confident and self-absorbed.This social media generation is more likely to be active on social networking sites, posting videos of themselves online and taunting their tattoos, and body piercing, to public display. The concepts of self-branding and self-promotions are an almost constant concern as well.

Recently, Gallop released a study, where it “found Millennials to be disengaged, aloof and completely incapable of prioritizing their own workload all while requiring constant pats on the back from management.”

Here are some generalities of a Millennial:

  • Less likely to own a car before a phone.
  • More likely to live at home after graduating from High School and College.
  • Less likely to work a full-time job. Although, this may not be their fault due to economic conditions; however, lack of employment opportunities has certainly contributed to their selfish condition by becoming more reliant on family and the state.
  • Dating and marrying much later in life. This also may be due to economic conditions?
  • Have less interpersonal skills, which may lead to problems with relationships and employers, etc.
  • High self-esteem and high-expectations, but lack a work ethic; this is a byproduct of the “everyone gets a trophy” attitude that pervaded the era of their youth.
  • More likely to get sexual satisfaction from the Internet than seeking a relationship.
  • More likely to be overweight and docile.
  • More likely to sleep with their cell phones next to them.
  • More likely to be educated beyond High School; but have less interest in local, national or international affairs.
  • And perhaps one of the most interesting topic to us in Freemasonry, Millennials demonstrate little to no interest in faith related activities.

You see, it is this group of 80 million Americans that will eventually control this country’s future. Not only this nation, but also the Craft itself. Again, Postmodernism teaches relativism – that there are no absolute truths, 74% of those surveyed believed, “Whatever is right for your life or works best for you is the only truth you can know.” Honestly, they really believe that. This too is a byproduct of not reading history, especially the history of religion; or in our case, the mysteries of ancient beliefs. In short, the majority of Millennials believes there is NO MORAL TRUE!

Simply stated, I am certainly glad to read that most creditable academics are now coming out against this destructive experiment of social control, i.e. Postmodernism. No, we will never fully go back to Modernism, nor should we. There were some good things that came out of Postmodernism as well, some of which we should certainly keep.

But, what next? What will the next generation give our civilization? Only time will tell! In the meantime, the Craft should hold fast to its values and traditions. We need to stop lowering the bar for entry into the Craft. And if this means closing some Lodges, so be it. Albert Pike was quite clear when he wrote about the great Masonic purge in 1826,

WE often profit more by our enemies than by our friends. “We support ourselves only on that which resists,” and owe our success to opposition. The best friends of Masonry in America were the Anti-Masons of 1826, and at the same time they were its worst enemies. Men are but the automata of Providence, and it uses the demagogue, the fanatic, and the knave, a common trinity in Republics, as its tools and instruments to effect that of which they do not dream, and which they imagine themselves commissioned to prevent.

The Anti-Masons, traitors and perjurors some, and some mere political knaves, purified Masonry by persecution, and so proved to be its benefactors; for that which is persecuted, grows. To them its present popularity is due, the cheapening of its Degrees, the invasion of its Lodges, that are no longer Sanctuaries, by the multitude; its pomp and pageantry and overdone display.

Yes, sadly, we may in fact have to wait for the next generation to solve are declining numbers; but, as mentioned above, this is not the first time this has happened in Masonic history, nor perhaps will it be the last.

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir


Rejection of Political Postmodernism


As many followers of my blog have witnessed, since January, I have been covering the topic of Postmodernism as it relates to Freemasonry. Here is a list of the topics I have written about: Postmodernism’s Ruination of Immortal Pursuits; Updated For The Postmodern Thinker: Online Etiquette For Masons; With Supporting Quotes From Albert Pike; Why Are We Encouraged To Explore Divinity Within Freemasonry If The Craft Is Not A Religion? Why Does Freemasonry Conceal Its Secrets From Even Its Own Members? Spiritual Anarchy and Freemasonry; Characteristics of a Postmodern Freemason; and Postmodernism And Its Devastating Effect On Freemasonry.

Now I am going to delve into a touchy subject: yes, politics. Normally, Freemasons are taught to shy away from discussing political issues. And there is a good reason for doing so. You see, in order to achieve the precepts of “Brotherly Love,” it is always better not to discuss such things for fear that it might alienate a Brother and his views. Therefore, I will take care not to offend anyone; but rather, I will discuss this current political movement in an objective manner.

Let me first state that I do not have a horse in the race this political season. You see, I teach history and the social sciences at a college; as such, I feel very comfortable researching and discussing our current political environment objectively, which a pure sociologist and historian is taught to do.

I do this exercise to help the brethren understand what is happening right now in our culture. In short, for the past 50 years or so, Postmodern thinking has influenced the American people, as well as other peoples in the Western world. However, things are certainly changing, and it is this change that has so many people worried.


Let us first explore the vote by Britain to leave the European Union (EU); most commonly referred to as Brexit. So what was this vote all about. There are, of course, countless claims and counter claims about the reasons for Britain’s decision to leave the EU. I take no position on the move itself. I do however find this movement within the realm of rejecting Postmodern thinking. Iskander Rehman perhaps said it best:

It is perhaps inevitable that such divisions should materialize within a union of 28 nations animated by disparate historical experiences, equipped with unequal levels of military resources, and confronted with different geostrategic predicaments. The turmoil engulfing the Old World’s periphery has peeled away at Europe’s residual postmodern illusions, exposing raw divisions and divergent hierarchies of interests.”

In short, Rehman said the decision to leave the EU was the final move in wiping out “residual postmodern illusions.” You see, as I have stated in my earlier commentaries on the topic of Postmodernism, such thinking is itself based on nothing other than the destruction of the old in the hope that something new would be better. Forget history, forget everything we have ever learned about out past; in essence, throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Now let us explore the rejection of Postmodernism closer to home. I have been watching this year’s political movements play themselves out. Just like our last election cycle, where we witnessed Ron Paul come ever so close to winning the Republican nomination, now we witnessed Bernie Sanders come so ever close as well. Both men, however, fell short because the political elites within the respective parties decided to make the decision for the American electorate. In short, the Democratic party actually worked against the interest of the American people in favor the status quo of Postmodernism. But what did Paul and Sanders represent? They represented change, or a rejection of Postmodernism within the political system. Some might even say a return to Modernism, at least to some degree; especially when it came to job creation. Although, to be intellectually honest, we could never truly return to Modernism, only because a portion of Postmodernism will always remain with the American people.

Or how about Donald Trump (Republican) vs. Hillary Clinton (Democrat), what do these candidates represent? Simply stated, Trump represents change, or a rejection of Postmodernism, and Clinton represents maintaining the status quo, or adherence to Postmodernism.

I find it most interesting that every time Trump puts his foot in his mouth or someone attacks his credibility, he surges another 2% in the polls. One has to ask, why is this happening? It’s simple, the American people, like so many people around the globe, don’t trust slick talking politicians who say one thing, yet do the opposite.

Just a short history lesson, the debate between Kennedy and Nixon during the 1960 presidential race illustrates the rise of Postmodernism (Kennedy) and the decline of Modernism (Nixon):

In 1960, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon squared off in the first televised presidential debates in American history. The Kennedy-Nixon debates not only had a major impact on the election’s outcome, but ushered in a new era in which crafting a public image and taking advantage of media exposure became essential ingredients of a successful political campaign. They also heralded the central role television has continued to play in the democratic process.”

It took taken some fifty years for the people of the world to understand that Postmodern hopism is an illusion; it solved nothing. It was an experiment in social control, and the 1960 debate between Kennedy and Nixon clearly illustrates this change in attitudes, as clearly as the Trump vs. Clinton candidacies do.

How will this end? Only time will tell. The bigger issue, however, is not the election itself; no, the biggest issue is the movement of rejecting Postmodernism and the destruction of such thinking. And this can be seen by Bernie Sander’s supporters who are rejecting any and all calls for party solidarity, despite Sander’s calls for it. In fact, he can’t even stop was has already started, “Sanders was at a loss. Here he was telling his most loyal supporters what needed to happen next in order to unify the party and beat Donald Trump. And they weren’t listening. They wanted revolution. Now, not later.”

I hope this brief essay has helped the reader better understand what is happening in our culture and not just within the Craft itself. Moreover, it is obvious that the people of the world have begun to understand that Postmodernism has been an obstacle to truly understanding Godly endeavors. Only time will tell if this change will have a lasting effect.

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir






Postmodernism’s Ruination of Immortal Pursuits


Like so many things yet to be discovered within the ancient mysteries, Immortality holds so much potential for the worthy recipient. Have you ever wondered why Freemasonry has such an affinity for the ancient mysteries. This was no accident. Have you ever wondered why the Craft asks us to study the ancient gods and the lessons from the ancient secret societies? This again was no accident. There are in fact countless lessons for the serious student to ponder, reflect and perhaps some day even understand. Immortality is one such lesson; if not the greatest knowledge ever discovered.

Furthermore, as my research of Albert Pike and Eliphas Levi’s writings continue, I found that Postmodernism has worked its way into the Craft, and as a result, our pursuit for Immortality has diminished. But before I delve into specifics, let me first define Immortality, which means, “the ability to live forever or eternal life.” Did you notice how the word is used to define two separate ideas and yet is still defined singularly; the first being physical Immortality or Immortality of the flesh, and the second being an eternal life, i.e. an after life or life after death. Upon my first and second reading of Pike’s book Morals and Dogma (1871), I did not make a distinction between the two. In fact, like most people, I was trained to think they were both one in the same. Here is yet another explanation:

Immortality is the indefinite continuation of a person’s existence, even after death. In common parlance, immortality is virtually indistinguishable from afterlife, but philosophically speaking, they are not identical. Afterlife is the continuation of existence after death, regardless of whether or not that continuation is indefinite. Immortality implies a never-ending existence, regardless of whether or not the body dies.”

Think about it for a moment, most people think Immortality means exclusively life after death, or Immortality of the soul; but more on that a little later. First, let us explore the possibility that man was meant to live an Immortal life if it was earned, and we have countless examples of Immortals to prove it. Here is a short list of several supporting ideas of Immorality, followed by prominent Immortal figures history has recorded:

  1. Christian theology holds that Adam and Eve lost physical immortality for themselves and all their descendants in the Fall of Man – this what what most people believe.
  2. In the New Testament, the Greek word traditionally translated “soul” (ψυχή) has substantially the same meaning as the Hebrew, without reference to an immortal soul. ‘Soul’ may refer to the whole person, the self: ‘three thousand souls’ were converted in Acts 2:41 (see Acts 3:23).
  3. The Persian word for “immortal” is associated with the month “Amurdad”, meaning “deathless” in Persian, in the Iranian calendar (near the end of July). The month of Amurdad or Ameretat is celebrated in Persian culture as ancient Persians believed the “Angel of Immortality” won over the “Angel of Death” in this month.
  4. According to one Tibetan Buddhist teaching, Dzogchen, individuals can transform the physical body into an immortal body of light called the rainbow body.
  5. Immortality in ancient Greek religion originally always included an eternal union of body and soul as can be seen in Homer, Hesiod, and various other ancient texts.
  6. As late as 1952, the editorial staff of the Syntopicon found in their compilation of the Great Books of the Western World, that “The philosophical issue concerning immortality cannot be separated from issues concerning the existence and nature of man’s soul.”
  7. Biologically immortal species:
    1. Bacteria – Bacteria reproduce through binary fission. A parent bacterium splits itself into two identical daughter cells which eventually then split themselves in half. This process repeats, thus making the bacterium essentially immortal. A 2005 PLoS Biology paper suggests that after each division the daughter cells can be identified as the older and the younger, and the older is slightly smaller, weaker, and more likely to die than the younger.
    2. Turritopsis dohrnii, a jellyfish (phylum Cnidaria, class Hydrozoa, order Anthoathecata), after becoming a sexually mature adult, can transform itself back into a polyp using the cell conversion process of transdifferentiation. Turritopsis nutricula repeats this cycle, meaning that it may have an indefinite lifespan. Its immortal adaptation has allowed it to spread from its original habitat in the Caribbean to “all over the world”.
    3. Hydra is a genus belonging to the phylum Cnidaria, the class Hydrozoa and the order Anthomedusae. They are simple fresh-water predatory animals possessing radial symmetry.
    4. Bristlecone pines are speculated to be potentially immortal; the oldest known living specimen is over 5,000 years old.
  8. Physical trauma would remain as a threat to perpetual physical life, as an otherwise immortal person would still be subject to unforeseen accidents or catastrophes.
  9. The Epic of Gilgamesh, one of the first literary works, is primarily a quest of a hero seeking to become immortal.
  10. There are numerous symbols representing immortality.
    1. The ankh is an Egyptian symbol of life that holds connotations of immortality when depicted in the hands of the gods and pharaohs, who were seen as having control over the journey of life.
    2. The Möbius strip in the shape of a trefoil knot is another symbol of immortality. Most symbolic representations of infinity or the life cycle are often used to represent immortality depending on the context they are placed in.
    3. Other examples include the Ouroboros, the Chinese fungus of longevity, the ten kanji, the phoenix, the peacock in Christianity, and the colors amaranth (in Western culture) and peach (in Chinese culture).
  11. A list of known Immortals:
    1. Ziusudra
    2. Markandeya
    3. Nicolas Flamel (Husband)
    4. Perenelle Flamel (Wife)
    5. Count of St. Germain (a member of several secret societies, i.e Masons)
    6. Parashurama
    7. John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, John of Patmos, John the Elder (the same man)
    8. The Three Nephites
    9. Tithonus
    10. The Wandering Jew
    11. King Arthur and the Grail Knights, Sir Galahad and Sir Perceval are considered immortals
    12. Merlin
    13. The crew of the Flying Dutchman
    14. Morgan le Fay
    15. Abaris the Hyperborean
    16. Joseph of Arimathea
    17. Mary (mother of Jesus)
    18. Roger Bacon (a Franciscan monk, a scientist, and an alchemist)
    19. Enoch
    20. Elijah
    21. Melchizedek
    22. Charles Fillmore
    23. Fulcanelli
    24. Apollonius of Tyana
    25. The Secret Chiefs of the A.·.A.·.
    26. Annalee Skarin
    27. Xi Wang Mu
    28. Shou Xin
    29. Ge Xuan
    30. Nirartha and Betari
    31. Zhong Li-Quan
    32. Lu Dong-Bin
    33. Zhang Guo-Lao
    34. Cao Guo-Jiu
    35. Han Xian-Zi
    36. Li Tie Kuai
    37. He Xian Gu
    38. Lan Cai He

The above names are just a short list that I compiled for the benefit of the readers of this article; it is, however, not inclusive of all known Immortals, nor does it include the thousands upon thousands of Immortals who live among us today, but who have chosen not to reveal themselves. For you see, an aspect of Immortal behavior is modesty; as well, revealing one’s Immortality may in fact put that person in jeopardy, which history has proven time and time again to be a concern for any person seeking Immortality. Furthermore, like within our own Masonic teachings, we are taught never to reveal our secrets to the profane; no accident there I believe, but just another valuable lesson to consider.


Now that the ideals of Immortality have been established, let us turn our attention to several written lessons from Albert Pike’s book, Morals and Dogma (1871) and Eliphas Levi’s book, The History of Magic (1850), both of whom taught a path to Immortality. Again, this was something I did not consider until after reading several of Levi’s books and compared them to Pike’s writings. My hope is, once the significance of Freemasonry is understood, my brothers will turn from their worldly teachings (Postmodernism) and became strident students of the Craft, which has countless hidden secrets to unveil to every worthy student of the ancient mysteries. Let us first start with Levi:

Levi wrote about the allegorical story of Orpheus:

“It matters little to us otherwise whether one of the Argonauts was called Orpheus or not, for the poetic creator has done more than live; he lives in immortality for ever. The Orphic fable is a complete dogma, a revelation of priestly destinies, a new ideal form of the worship of beauty. The regeneration and redemption of love are indicated already therein (Eliphas Levi, The History of Magic, 1850, p, 137).

I underlined several key points to consider in the above quote. In short, Orpheus is a fable (story) about man’s potential to live forever – “he lives in immortality for ever.” This belief “is a complete dogma” (belief) or “a revelation of priestly destinies (potential);” and better yet, “a new ideal form of worship (sacred).” You see, as will become evident in time, in order to attain an Immortal state of existence, one must completely live and practice the principles of love – “The regeneration of redemption of love.” It should also be stressed that “Orpheus was a founder and prophet of the so-called ‘Orphic’ mysteries,” which held that the human soul was divine and immortal, and through initiation rites man could commune as a god with God.

Levi wrote about attaining equilibrium, a necessary law within the mysteries:

“Being is substance and life; life manifests by movement; movement is perpetuated by equilibrium; equilibrium is therefore the law of immortality. Conscience is the awareness of equilibrium, which is equity and justice. All excess, when it is not mortal, is corrected by an opposite excess; it is the eternal law of reaction; but if excess subverts all equilibrium it is lost in the outer darkness and becomes eternal death” (Eliphas Levi, The History of Magic, 1850, p, 348).

Here we see that equilibrium is a necessary “law of immortality.” That all excess must be corrected, “All excess, when it is not mortal, is corrected by an opposite excess;” for “excess subverts all equilibrium… and becomes eternal death.”

Levi discusses Raymund Lully; why?

He betook himself to prayer, and devoted his existence to good works; God granted him all graces save that of death, but of what profit are the others in the absence of that which should complete and crown them all? One day the Tree of Knowledge was shewn to him, laden with its luminous fruits; he understood being and its harmonies; he divined the Kabalah; he established the foundations and sketched the plan of an universal science, from which time he was saluted as the illuminated doctor. So did he obtain glory, that fatal recompense of toil which God, in His mercy, seldom confers upon great men till after their death, because it intoxicates and poisons the living. But Raymund Lully, who could not by death give place to the glory after, might have occasion to fear that it would perish before himself, and meanwhile it could seem to him only a derision of his immortal misfortune. He knew how to make gold, so that he might purchase the world and all its kingdoms, yet he could not assure to himself the humblest tomb. He was the pauper of immortality. Everywhere he went begging for death, and no one was able to give it him” (Eliphas Levi, The History of Magic, 1850, p, 389-390).

Here we read about the Immortal existence of Raymund Lully, a Franciscan alchemist. Levi told us, partially, how Lully was able to attain Immortality, which was through prayer and good works, “God granted him all graces save that of death.” He was able to attain something most people do not attain until after death – God “seldom confers upon great men till after their death.” But to him, he did not realize what he had asked for. You see, Lully eventually realized he wanted to die, but could not, “Everywhere he went begging for death, and no one was able to give it him.” In short, Lully considered such a blessing a misfortune. The lesson being, be careful what you ask for.

Levi discusses fatality, which means, “an occurrence of death by accident, in war, or from disease” or “helplessness in the face of fate.”

So long as man is subject to the dictates of fatality, he is profane—that is to say, a man who must be excluded from the sanctuary of knowledge, because in his hands knowledge would become a terrible instrument of destruction. On the contrary, the man who is free, who governs by understanding the blind instincts of life, is essentially a preserver and repairer, for Nature is the domain of his power and the temple of his immortality. When the uninitiated seeks to do good the result is evil. On the other hand, the true initiate can never will to do evil; if he strikes it is to chastise and to cure. The breath of the uninitiated is deadly, that of the initiate is life-giving. He who is profane suffers that others may suffer also, but the initiate endures in order that others may be spared. He who is profane steeps his arrows in his own blood and poisons them; he who is initiated cures the most cruel wounds by a single drop of his blood” (Eliphas Levi, The History of Magic, 1850, p, 588-589).

In order to attain an Immortal state of physical existence, one must not allow himself to become a man of fate, which means, a helpless victim to death and the deeds associated with such thinking. In fact, Levi went so far as to say that a man who thinks that he will eventually die, is profane and not worthy enough to gain this initiated knowledge; I know, a powerful statement. Needless to say, this exercise could go on and on; I will, however, now switch to Pike, who was a student of Levi, to complete this important exercise.

Pike wrote that the acacia at the head of the grave is a sign of Immortality:

“The bush of acacia placed at the head of the grave of Khir-Om is an emblem of resurrection and immortality” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 471).

The pyramid is also a sign of Immortality:

“In the Quaternary we find the first solid figure, the universal symbol of immortality, the pyramid” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 464).

Dionusos was the healer, author of life and Immortality:

“It was said that Dionusos or Poseidon had preceded Apollo in the Oracular office; and Dionusos continued to be esteemed in Greek Theology as Healer and Saviour, Author of Life and Immortality” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 430).

The mysteries teach Immorality:

The Mysteries were practised as a means of perfecting the soul, of making it to know its own dignity, of reminding it of its noble origin and immortality, and consequently of its relations with the Universe and the Deity” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 307).

Please remember not to read this quote from the singular perspective that Immortality simply means life after death; no, Immortality also means the continuation of your existence or current life.

Our ceremonies are intended to purify us into an Immortal state of existence:

“Human ceremonies are indeed but imperfect symbols; and the alternate baptisms in fire and water intended to purify us into immortality, are ever in this world interrupted at the moment of their anticipated completion” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 290).

Immortality must be earned:

“If we but eat and drink and sleep, and let everything go on around us as it pleases; or if we live but to amass wealth or gain office or wear titles, we might as well not have lived at all; nor have we any right to expect immortality” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 122-23).

Again, this exercise could go on and on. I will not reveal anything further on the topic of Immortality, for the fear that such knowledge may find its way into the hands of the profane. My intent is clear however, I only want to demonstrate again the worth and value of Freemasonry and its endless knowledge to the worthy student. I hope you found this knowledge helpful, and will seek further light within the mysteries and not our contemporary Postmodern world of delusions. You see, the simple act of Postmodern thinking is hindering anyone who desires an Immortal life, both physically (flesh) and spiritual (soul).

And on a personal level, I think the term Immortality was designed the way it is because most people will never earn a state of physical Immortality, but may gain a state for an Immortal soul; thereby fulfilling its dual mandate.

If you want to know more about Postmodernism’s devastating effect on the Craft, please consider reading these related articles that I have written in this past year:

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir


Updated For The Postmodern Thinker: Online Etiquette For Masons; With Supporting Quotes From Albert Pike.

I recently conducted a search of the Internet and discovered that some Freemasons continue to feel it is OK to discredit my name, as well as other Masonic online authors, who are only attempting to spread Masonic knowledge; which is a mandate going back to the 1723 Constitutions of Free-Masons (p. 56), and can be seen in the words of Albert Pike, “To learn, to attain knowledge, to be wise, is a necessity for every truly noble soul; to teach, to communicate that knowledge, to share that wisdom with others, and not churlishly to lock up his exchequer, and place a sentinel at the door to drive away the needy, is equally an impulse of a noble nature, and the worthiest work of man” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 108). Needless to say, reading such rhetorical writings can be disheartening, but is to be expected, especially when one considers that most Freemason are only Blue Lodge Masons with a limited scope of the Craft, and have been educated by way of Postmodernism, which “is typically defined by an attitude of skepticism or distrust toward grand narratives, ideologies, and various tenets of Enlightenment rationality, including the existence of objective reality and absolute truth, as well as notions of rationality, human nature, and progress;” a topic I have written about at length since January on this blog. With this said, I feel it is necessary to again post my earlier article, Online Etiquette For Masons; With Supporting Quotes From Albert Pike. Although, updated with the Postmodern thinker in mind. Please help spread this article, for I personally believe that our public face is something every Mason should be concerned with. I have used this article countless times when a Mason was acting inappropriately online; try it, it really works.


I am often puzzled by the Postmodern Mason who travels the internet looking for weaker prey, or who is looking to pick an online fight with another Mason. Did he (or she) not learn anything from his Masonic lessons? Well, he actually did, but in a misguided effort to protect the craft, he instead has become a cyberbully. Instead of accepting another Masonic viewpoint, he actually goes out of his way to discredit the brother (or sister if a Co-Mason or a woman only Mason); this is an act unbecoming a Mason who desires a high moral character. As such, after some reflection, I have decided to write my own views on the matter; and here they are, with supporting quotes from Albert Pike’s book Morals and Dogma, 1871.

Online Etiquette For Masons:

1. Just State Your Views In A Polite, None Threatening Or Offensive Manner:

When posting a comment online, do nothing more than state your views in a polite inoffensive manner. Never try to provoke another Mason by asking a question you already know the answer to. This is a common tactic of a Postmodern Masonic cyberbully. I am weary of the Mason who asks a question only to turn it into an unwinnable debate. You see, some men (and women) don’t take their Masonic lessons with them after they leave lodge; as Pike confirmed:

“A man may be a good sort of man in general, and yet a very bad man in particular: good in the Lodge and bad in the world; good in public, and bad in his family; good at home, and bad on a journey or in a strange city. Many a man earnestly desires to be a good Mason. He says so, and is sincere. But if you require him to resist a certain passion, to sacrifice a certain indulgence, to control his appetite at a particular feast, or to keep his temper in a dispute, you will find that he does not wish to be a good Mason, in that particular case; or, wishing, is not able to resist his worse impulses” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 151).

2. Never Debate Another Mason Online:

I have found that there is not enough space or time in an online forum to truly debate any Masonic question. It is best to, again, just state your opinion in an inoffensive manner, or simply quote the opinion of a prominent Masonic author, and move on. Most often, I go online for Masonic inspiration, education and ideas; however, sometimes I find infighting, which is a behavior unbecoming a Mason; or as Pike so poignantly wrote:

Wherever there is strife and hatred among the brethren, there is no Masonry; for Masonry is Peace, and Brotherly Love, and Concord” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 124).

When I see such behavior, I often feel compelled to leave that forum and never return to it. In fact, because some sites are so poorly monitored, and it happens so often, and is so harsh, I simply leave (un-join) the group, and never return to it; and I have done so on numerous occasions. Why might you ask? It’s simple, because I believe Masonry is a personal journey of discovery, and not a debate club, or as Pike wrote about interpreting Masonic legends and its history:

WHETHER the legend and history of this Degree are historically true, or but an allegory, containing in itself a deeper truth and a profounder meaning, we shall not now debate. If it be but a legendary myth, you must find out for yourself what it means (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 204).

You see, if Pike was asked a question today about online debating of Masonic history and its legends, I believe he would say the same thing he said in 1871, that, “we should not now debate;” rather, he would tell us that we must find out for our self what something means. Therefore, making a public Postmodern spectacle online, in the end, does nothing to really change another Mason’s mind. Pike wrote about “venal orators” and their destructive antics, and contrasted them to having eloquence for good purposes, to teach etc:

If you have Eloquence, it is a mighty force. See that you use it for good purposes—to teach, exhort, ennoble the people, and not to mislead and corrupt them. Corrupt and venal orators are the assassins of the public liberties and of public morals.” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 91).


3. Think Before Responding, Because There Is Power In Your Thoughts And Words; So Use Them Wisely:

In the past, I let my emotions get the best of me, and I responded too quickly, which led me to writing something I regretted a few days later. I now take several hours to reflect, and sometimes I take a day or two, before responding. This has helped me better phrase my words, so they won’t be perceived as offensive. Pike wrote about the immortal power of thoughts and words, and their existence within the soul:

Take, then, the attributes of the soul. I am conscious that I exist and am the same identical person that I was twenty years ago. I am conscious that my body is not I,–that if my arms were lopped away, this person that I call ME, would still remain, complete, entire, identical as before. But I cannot ascertain, by the most intense and long-continued reflection, what I am, nor where within my body I reside, nor whether I am a point, or an expanded substance. I have no power to examine and inspect. I exist, will, think, perceive. That I know, and nothing more. I think a noble and sublime Thought. What is that Thought? It is not Matter, nor Spirit. It is not a Thing; but a Power and Force. I make upon a paper certain conventional marks, that represent that Thought. There is no Power or Virtue in the marks I write, but only in the Thought which they tell to others. I die, but the Thought still lives. It is a Power. It acts on men, excites them to enthusiasm, inspires patriotism, governs their conduct, controls their destinies, disposes of life and death. The words I speak are but a certain succession of particular sounds, that by conventional arrangement communicate to others the Immaterial, Intangible, Eternal Thought. The fact that Thought continues to exist an instant, after it makes its appearance in the soul, proves it immortal: for there is nothing conceivable that can destroy it. The spoken words, being mere sounds, may vanish into thin air, and the written ones, mere marks, be burned, erased, destroyed: but the THOUGHT itself lives still, and must live on forever. A Human Thought, then, is an actual EXISTENCE, and a FORCE and POWER, capable of acting upon and controlling matter as well as mind. Is not the existence of a God, who is the immaterial soul of the Universe, and whose THOUGHT, embodied or not embodied in His WORD, is an Infinite Power, of Creation and production, destruction and preservation, quite as comprehensible as the existence of a Soul, of a Thought separated from the Soul, of the Power of that Thought to mold the fate and influence the Destinies of Humanity” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 573)?

4. Sometimes It Is Better Not To Respond At All:

Sometimes I don’t respond at all. I do this because I felt the question or comment was only used to lead me into a debate; something I hate doing, because I personally believe such behavior may tarnish my soul. Many times, I have to remind myself about what Pike wrote of men who appear to be virtuous, who quote good words only to glaze over their bad deeds. Simply stated, I am more concerned with a man’s actions and deeds than his words. Pike wrote:

“A great Preacher well said, “Therefore thou art inexcusable. O Man, whosoever thou art, that judgest; for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself: for thou that judgest, doest the same things.” It is amazing to see how men can talk of virtue and honor, whose life denies both. It is curious to see with what a marvellous facility many bad men quote Scripture. It seems to comfort their evil consciences, to use good words; and to glaze over bad deeds with holy texts, wrested to their purpose. Often, the more a man talks about Charity and Toleration, the less he has of either; the more he talks about Virtue, the smaller stock he has of it. The mouth speaks out of the abundance of the heart; but often the very reverse of what the man practices. And the vicious and sensual often express, and in a sense feel, strong disgust at vice and sensuality. Hypocrisy is not so common as is imagined” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 150).

5. Don’t Invite Others Into A Discussion Only To Gang Up On Another Mason:

I have seen this unbecoming Postmodern behavior several times on Facebook. The Postmodern cyberbullying Mason has a group of followers, which he uses to discredit other Masonic viewpoints. The Mason plugs in the names of his followers into the group conversation, and pretty soon you see four or five, sometimes even 7 or more, ganging up on another Mason and his views on a particular point. On the surface, it might look like the Masonic cyberbullying gang has won the argument; but not really. You see, their success was only limited to their cyberbullying group of Postmodern Masons; all the good Masons had already left, or chose not to participate in the unbecoming behavior. Sadly, this destructive behavior has a negative impact on young and new Masons; for you see, when they witness this kind of online behavior they either leave disheartened and thinking negatively about the craft, or adapt to become accepted by their peers. And they too become a Postmodern cyberbully Mason; and the cycle continues uninterrupted. Pike wrote about respecting others and their opinions, and compared that type of individual to a gentle, kind, good honest and principled person:

Those who forget the rights of others, must not be surprised if their own are forgotten; and those who stoop to the lowest embraces of sense must not wonder, if others are not concerned to find their prostrate honor, and lift it up to the remembrance and respect of the world. To the gentle, many will be gentle; to the kind, many will be kind. A good man will find that there is goodness in the world; an honest man will find that there is honesty in the world; and a man of principle will find principle and integrity in the minds of others” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 193-194).

6. Don’t Ever Attack Other Masonic Orders (Rites) Or Other Esoteric Organizations, Especially Clandestine Orders, And Never Tell Another Person That He Or She Is Not A True Mason Because They Do Not Belong To Your Order:

Simply stated, nothing is really ever gained by attacking others online. By doing so, all you do is create enemies, and tarnish your own soul in the process. When a Postmodern Mason attacks other organizations as being illegitimate, he only succeeds in demonstrating his own ignorance about the lessons within Masonry. So what if some orders accept women and others do not; or some orders charge more money than others; or there are two Grand Lodges fighting for control; and so forth and so on. When a Mason attacks another order, viewpoint or position, he does nothing to change those organizations or its followers; such behavior only makes enemies of them. Interestingly, quite often I have found many people from different and unaffiliated orders more knowledgeable about Masonic esoteric history, doctrine and behavior than the common Master Mason of traditional Blue Lodge Masonry, who so often love to attack others based only on the limited knowledge he gained from exclusive Blue Lodge instruction. Pike confirmed the basis for the craft when he wrote about morality and virtue, and disinterestedness:

The bases of Masonry being morality and virtue, it is by studying one and practicing the other, that the conduct of a Mason becomes irreproachable. The good of Humanity being its principal object, disinterestedness is one of the first virtues that it requires of its members; for that is the source of justice and beneficence” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 185).

Think about it, Masons don’t generally attack the none-Mason for not being a Mason, but some Postmodern Masons think it is fair game to attack Masons of other orders, like none-affiliated orders and so called clandestine orders; really, how hypocritical is that? Basically, what they are saying is, like a naive high school freshman, “our team is better than your team,” which is another ingenuous behavior.

Furthermore, Pike also wrote about our own ignorance when it comes to God’s plan for humanity; this includes Mason and none-Mason alike, and all the different non-affiliated orders of the broader craft:

All errors are not equally innocuous. That which is most injurious is to entertain unworthy conceptions of the nature and attributes of God; and it is this that Masonry symbolizes by ignorance of the True Word. The true word of a Mason is, not the entire, perfect, absolute truth in regard to God; but the highest and noblest conception of Him that our minds are capable of forming; and this word is Ineffable, because one man cannot communicate to another his own conception of Deity; since every man’s conception of God must be proportioned to his mental cultivation, and intellectual powers, and moral excellence. God is, as man conceives Him, the reflected image of man himself.

For every man’s conception of God must vary with his mental cultivation and mental powers. If any one contents himself with any lower image than his intellect is capable of grasping, then he contents himself with that which is false to him, as well as false in fact. If lower than he can reach, he must needs feel it to be false. And if we, of the nineteenth century after Christ, adopt the conceptions of the nineteenth century before Him; if our conceptions of God are those of the ignorant, narrow-minded, and vindictive Israelite; then we think worse of God, and have a lower, meaner, and more limited view of His nature, than the faculties which He has bestowed are capable of grasping. The highest view we can form is nearest to the truth. If we acquiesce in any lower one, we acquiesce in an untruth. We feel that it is an affront and an indignity to Him, to conceive of Him as cruel, short-sighted, capricious, and unjust; as a jealous, an angry, a vindictive Being. When we examine our conceptions of His character, if we can conceive of a loftier, nobler, higher, more beneficent, glorious, and magnificent character, then this latter is to us the true conception of Deity; for nothing can be imagined more excellent than He” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 223-224).

Ever wonder why this world has so many different religions? It’s simple, as Pike wrote above, “because one man cannot communicate to another his own conception of Deity.” Is it any wonder than why we also have so many different orders within the broader craft. In short, the whole of Masonry, and its many non-affiliated orders, cannot truly advance this world spiritually until we stop attacking each other online and offline.

7. Don’t Go Online To Self-Aggrandize Yourself Or Your Order (Rite); Rather, Go Online To Find Inspiration And Share Knowledge For Personal Advancement ~ Let Us Do Away With This Odious Self-Flattery:

Why do some Postmodern Masons feel the need to be better than others? Also, why are some Postmodern Masons compelled to judge our Masonic brethren and sistren in hast? Yes, let us strive to be more like God; but always remember that God loves all his children, not just the Masons of your order (rite). Pike wrote:

“Continually you praise each other, and utter elaborate and high-wrought eulogies upon the Order. Everywhere you assume that you are what you should be, and nowhere do you look upon yourselves as you are. Is it true that all our actions are so many acts of homage to virtue? Explore the recesses of your hearts; let us examine ourselves with an impartial eye, and make answer to our own questioning! Can we bear to ourselves the consoling testimony that we always rigidly perform our duties; that we even half perform them?

Let us away with this odious self-flattery! Let us be men, if we cannot be sages! The laws of Masonry, above others excellent, cannot wholly change men’s natures. They enlighten them, they point out the true way; but they can lead them in it, only by repressing the fire of their passions, and subjugating their selfishness. Alas, these conquer, and Masonry is forgotten!

After praising each other all our lives, there are always excellent Brethren, who, over our coffins, shower unlimited eulogies. Every one of us who dies, however useless his life, has been a model of all the virtues, a very child of the celestial light. In Egypt, among our old Masters, where Masonry was more cultivated than vanity, no one could gain admittance to the sacred asylum of the tomb until he had passed under the most solemn judgment. A grave tribunal sat in judgment upon all, even the kings. They said to the dead. “Whoever thou art, give account to thy country of thy actions! What hast thou done with thy time and life? The law interrogates thee, thy country hears thee, Truth sits in judgment on thee!” Princes came there to be judged, escorted only by their virtues and their vices. A public accuser recounted, the history of the dead man’s life, and threw the blaze of the torch of truth on all his actions. If it were adjudged that he had led an evil life, his memory was condemned in the presence of the nation, and his body was denied the honors of sepulture. What a lesson the old Masonry taught to the sons of the people” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 186-187).

8. Be Fair In Your Judgment of Another Mason (Or Another Person); And Never Comment On Someone’s Motives:

I have seen it time and time again, a Postmodern Mason will speculate on another Mason’s motives when responding to an online post or response. The enlightened Mason should lean on his or her Masonic education, which includes not judging another person too quickly. Pike wrote about the Masons “who are invested with the power of judgment,” should “in deducing the motive” of another person “not assign to the act either the best or the worst motives,” rather, they should be “just and fair:”

Those who are invested with the power of judgment should judge the causes of all persons uprightly and impartially, without any personal consideration of the power of the mighty, or the bribe of the rich, or the needs of the poor. That is the cardinal rule, which no one will dispute; though many fail to observe it. But they must do more. They must divest themselves of prejudice and preconception. They must hear patiently, remember accurately, and weigh carefully the facts and the arguments offered before them. They must not leap hastily to conclusions, nor form opinions before they have heard all. They must not presume crime or fraud. They must neither be ruled by stubborn pride of opinion, nor be too facile and yielding to the views and arguments of others. In deducing the motive from the proven act, they must not assign to the act either the best or the worst motives, but those which they would think it just and fair for the world to assign to it, if they themselves had done if; nor must they endeavor to make many little circumstances, that weigh nothing separately, weigh much together, to prove their own acuteness and sagacity. These are sound rules for every juror, also, to observe.

In our intercourse with others, there are two kinds of injustice: the first, of those who offer an injury; the second, of those who have it in their power to avert an injury from those to whom it is offered, and yet do it not. So active injustice may be done in two waysby force and by fraud,–of which force is lion-like, and fraud fox-like,--both utterly repugnant to social duty, but fraud the more detestable.

Every wrong done by one man to another, whether it affect his person, his property, his happiness, or his reputation, is an offense against the law of justice. The field of this Degree is therefore a wide and vast one; and Masonry seeks for the most impressive mode of enforcing the law of justice, and the most effectual means of preventing wrong and injustice.

To this end it teaches this great and momentous truth: that wrong and injustice once done cannot be undone” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 126).

9. Be Concerned With How Your Actions Will Be Looked Upon By Others In The Craft And Outside The Craft:

I know I alluded to this topic earlier; however, it truly needs to be addressed in its own stand alone section. Masonry is a big umbrella, with a lot of people from differing backgrounds. As such, we will not all agree on everything, nor should we; especially given the fact that Masonry was designed as an individual adventure. Yet, despite this understanding, we still retain some Postmodern Masons who act according to their worldly instruction, rather than Masonic instruction; and they get away with this behavior because many Masons empower them by agreeing with, or disagreeing with, them in an online forum. Instead, we should simply walk away from them, and not empower them anymore. Pike mentioned this problem when he asked why we still retain some Masons who excite rivalries and jealousies:

Your debates should be but friendly conversations. You need concord, union, and peace. Why then do you retain among you men who excite rivalries and jealousies; why permit great and violent controversy and ambitious pretensions? How do your own words and acts agree? If your Masonry is a nullity, how can you exercise any influence on others (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 186)?

As well, be very careful when writing about your political and religious viewpoints, for this too may look poorly upon you and the craft. I am often confused when a Postmodern Mason makes an offhand political or religious comment for or against a position. Again, I have to ask, did they not learn anything from their Masonic lessons? Pike wrote about the problems of politics and religion:

“In every credo, religious or political as in the soul of man, there are two regions, the Dialectic and the Ethic; and it is only when the two are harmoniously blended, that a perfect discipline is evolved. There are men who dialectically are Christians, as there are a multitude who dialectically are Masons, and yet who are ethically Infidels, as these are ethically of the Profane, in the strictest sense:–intellectual believers, but practical atheists:–men who will write you “Evidences,” in perfect faith in their logic, but cannot carry out the Christian or Masonic doctrine, owing to the strength, or weakness, of the flesh. On the other hand, there are many dialectical skeptics, but ethical believers, as there are many Masons who have never undergone initiation; and as ethics are the end and purpose of religion, so are ethical believers the most worthy. He who does right is better than he who thinks right. But you must not act upon the hypothesis that all men are hypocrites, whose conduct does not square with their sentiments. No vice is more rare, for no task is more difficult, than systematic hypocrisy. When the Demagogue becomes a Usurper it does not follow that he was all the time a hypocrite. Shallow men only so judge of others” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p 35).

Therefore, when a topic of discussion becomes unMasonic, simply leave it, don’t respond, and if need be, leave the site. Don’t empower these Postmodern Masons by either praising them, liking their comments, or making a comment in support of, or against, their statement; for some people love to be attacked, and attack others who disagree with their position; it empowers them. On several occasions, I have witnessed a negative statement made by a Mason go unchallenged, with no likes or comments, which told me that others did not enjoy what had been written online. I personally think this is the best way of stating your displeasure online. Just leave the unMasonic statement alone; it is toxic.

10: Never Flatter Another Mason:

I have seen this behavior from time to time; although it does not happen that much. There is a fine line between acknowledging someones years of service, efforts and rank within the craft, and flattering them. I have seen the embarrassment and shame some Masons feel when they are overtly flattered. You see, Masonry teaches humbleness; so when a Postmodern Mason unknowingly flatters another Mason, he may, in fact, be hurting him or embarrassing him personally, and his reputation; even when done online. Pike confirmed my concerns when he wrote:

Flattery, either of individual or people, corrupts both the receiver and the giver; and adulation is not of more service to the people than to kings. A Cæsar, securely seated in power, cares less for it than a free democracy; nor will his appetite for it grow to exorbitance, as that of a people will, until it becomes insatiate. The effect of liberty to individuals is, that they may do what they please; to a people, it is to a great extent the same. If accessible to flattery, as this is always interested, and resorted to on low and base motives, and for evil purposes, either individual or people is sure, in doing what it pleases, to do what in honor and conscience should have been left undone. One ought not even to risk congratulations, which may soon be turned into complaints; and as both individuals and peoples are prone to make a bad use of power, to flatter them, which is a sure way to mislead them, well deserves to be called a crime” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 83).

11. Don’t Attack Another Mason’s Grammar, Misspelling Or Word Usage Online; If It Bothers You That Much, Just Send A Private Message Letting Him or Her Know There Are Errors, And Make Suggestions.

This is a favorite tool of the Postmodern Masonic cyberbully. Simply stated, if he (or she) does not like what was written, instead of countering with logic, or countering with his own posting, or blog site, he goes after the other Mason’s grammar, etc. Think about it, how often do we read comments online that have grammatical errors in them. Literally, I read hundreds of comments everyday that have errors in them, but I never comment. Generally, I can make sense of what was written and let it go. There is a book in the middle of each Blue Lodge room, and we call it the rule and guide of our faith; yes, it is the Holy Bible. It is there to guide us. Therefore, what does it say about pointing out another person’s errors?

“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7: 3-5, NIV).

Also, I have read many great works of literature that had countless mistakes in them; but I can still make sense of what was written, and find value in the author’s work. I am often reminded of J. K. Rowling’s book series about Harry Potter, which had hundreds upon hundreds of errors in them. Yet, her books are still the most popular children’s books ever written. Better yet, how about Albert Pike’s original book, Morals and Dogma (1871), which also has hundreds upon hundreds of errors in it. Please remember, not everyone was an English major in college; a point English majors love to throw about. The closest thing I could find from Pike on the matter is when he wrote about the misunderstanding of words, which are often misused just like symbols are:

“A single example of the symbolism of words will indicate to you one branch of Masonic study. We find in the English Rite this phrase: ‘I will always hail, ever conceal, and never reveal;’ and in the Catechism, these:  “Q∴ ‘I hail.’ A∴ ‘I conceal;’ and ignorance, misunderstanding the word ‘hail,’ has interpolated the phrase, “From whence do you hail!’ But the word is really ‘hele,’ from the Anglo-Saxon verb elan, helan, to cover, hide, or conceal. And this word is rendered by the Latin verb tegere, to cover or roof over. ‘That ye fro me no thynge woll hele,’ says Gower. ‘They hele fro me no priuyte,’ says the Romaunt of the Rose. ‘To heal a house,’ is a common phrase in Sussex; and in the west of England, he that covers a house with slates is called a Healer. Wherefore, to ‘heal‘ means the same thing as to ’tile,’–itself symbolic, as meaning, primarily, to cover a house with tiles,–and means to cover, hide, or conceal. Thus language too is symbolism, and words are as much misunderstood and misused as more material symbols are (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 63).

Which means there have always been errors with regard to language, written words and symbolism, and these errors will perhaps always remain; so get over it and move on? I find the only reason a Postmodern Mason would comment publicly about another Mason’s written errors is to denigrate him or her in front of others, and to raise himself above the author. Which I believe is another ingenuous behavior unbecoming a Mason who desires a high moral character.

12. Don’t Attack, Or Comment Negatively About, Albert Pike Or His Book, Morals And Dogma:

Simply stated, when you attack Albert Pike, you are attacking the order of Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, and when you comment negatively on Pike, you are portraying that Masonic order negatively, both of which are acts unbecoming a Mason who desires a high moral character. Albert Pike is the author of the popular book Morals and Dogma (1871, 2011), which is given to initiates when they first become Masons of the order.

A favorite pastime of the Postmodern Masonic cyberbully is to say that Pike was a racist because he fought for the south in the American Civil War, which made him a segregationist, and by extension, a racist. Alternatively, that he was a member of the Scottish Rite KKK Project, which is an outright fabrication by Anton Chaitkin, a founding member of the Lyndon LaRouche movement. You see, when a Mason makes such a claim, he or she only demonstrates a lack of knowledge on the topic; like no supporting documentation or referencing of the claims. Yet, one only needs to read his book Morals and Dogma to see that he spoke out against the injustice of slavery and the separation of the races:

“And as to London–it looked like judgment, if it be true that the Asiatic cholera had its origin in English avarice and cruelty, as they suppose who trace it to the tax which Warren Hastings, when Governor-General of India, imposed on salt, thus cutting off its use from millions of the vegetable-eating races of the East: just as that disease whose spectral shadow lies always upon America’s threshold, originated in the avarice and cruelty of the slave-trade, translating the African coast fever to the congenial climate of the West Indies and Southern America–the yellow fever of the former, and the vomito negro of the latter.

But we should be slow to make inferences from our petty human logic to the ethics of the Almighty. Whatever the cruelty of the slave-trade, or the severity of slavery on the continents or islands of America, we should still, in regard to its supposed consequences, be wiser, perhaps, to say with that great and simple Casuist Who gave the world the Christian religion: “Suppose ye that these Galileans were sinners above all the Galileans because they suffered such things? or those eighteen upon whom the tower of Siloam fell and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all the men that dwelt in Jerusalem?

Retribution bars retaliation, even in words. A city shattered, burned, destroyed, desolate, a land wasted, humiliated, made a desert and a wilderness, or wearing the thorny crown of humiliation and subjugation, is invested with the sacred prerogatives and immunities of the dead. The base human revenge of exultation at its fall and ruin should shrink back abashed in the presence of the infinite Divine chastisement. ‘Forgiveness is wiser than revenge,’ our Freemasonry teaches us, ‘and it is better to love than to hate.’ Let him who sees in great calamities the hand of God, be silent, and fear His judgments.

Men are great or small in stature as it pleases God. But their nature is great or small as it pleases themselves. Men are not born, some with great souls and some with little souls. One by taking thought cannot add to his stature, but he can enlarge his soul. By an act of the will he can make himself a moral giant, or dwarf himself to a pigmy” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 812-813).

Pike also wrote that God has no color; the Parsees, by the way, where from India:

The Parsees, retaining the old religion taught by Zaradisht, say in their catechism: ‘We believe in only one God, and do not believe in any beside Him; Who created the Heavens, the Earth, the AngelsOur God has neither face nor form, color nor shape, nor fixed place. There is no other like Him, nor can our mind comprehend Him‘” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 620).

Or when Pike wrote that black and white will commingle when the depots cease to slay and ravage:

Where the armies of the despots cease to slay and ravage, the armies of ‘Freedom’ take their place, and, the black and white commingled, slaughter and burn and ravish. Each age re-enacts the crimes as well as the follies of its predecessors, and still war licenses outrage and turns fruitful lands into deserts, and God is thanked in the Churches for bloody butcheries, and the remorseless devastators, even when swollen by plunder, are crowned with laurels and receive ovations” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 295).

Still others like to comment on his writing style, and that he copied much of his work. Again, it is truly unfair to relate modern writing styles to those of the past. In addition, when a Mason attacks either his spelling errors, or his comprehension style, the Postmodern Mason only demonstrates a lack of knowledge from the period. Many authors of the period did not reference, like they do today; in fact, in many eastern countries, copying is an acceptable behavior even today. It has only become unacceptable in the west in the last century or so. Also, when Pike wrote his book, he assumed it would only be given to a small group of men with high intellectual backgrounds (leaders of the Scottish Rite, SJ). It was not written for the general Mason; only after his death did it become widely distributed. As for spelling errors, as a historian, I have read countless books going back centuries that had spelling errors in them; as such, this too was a common occurrence from the period. I have come to understand such mistakes to be as much from the printer/type setter, as the author. For me anyway, when someone complains about such mistakes, they only end up demonstrating their lack of comprehension skills, and their ability to truly understand his great book. Also, if such mistakes bother you that much, simply go to the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction website and order the newest edition of his book Morals and Dogma, which has been updated to modern academic standards.

I will be writing on this topic more in the near future, so look for it on this blog site.


13. Be Careful When Using Humor Online; It Is A tool To Hide Or Sway Intentions:

I have seen it repeatedly online, a Postmodern Mason will attempt to use humor to sway the conversation, or it ends up being misinterpreted. Always remember, the other person cannot see your facial expressions or mannerisms, which are important components when using humor, or trying to tell a joke. Pike was very much aware of the use of humor in history and spoke of its misdealings on several occasions; like when he wrote that the despot will use whatever means available to him to sway the opinion of another:

Under a Despotism, men are false, treacherous, and deceitfulthey are so as a means of attaining popularity… Experience will probably prove that these odious and detestable vices will grow most rankly and spread most rapidly… and fraud becomes the highway to the latter, the land will reek with falsehood and sweat lies and chicane… To adapt one’s opinions to the popular humor; to defend, apologize for, and justify the popular follies; to advocate the expedient and the plausible; to caress, cajole, and flatter the elector” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 66).

But rather, the Mason “labors equally to defend and to improve the people. He does not flatter them to mislead them, nor fawn upon them to rule them, nor conceal his opinions to humor them, nor tell them that they can never err, and that their voice is the voice of God” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 177).

14. Don’t Use A Pseudonym, Or Trust Any Mason Using A Pseudonym Online:

Sadly, I find the Postmodern Masonic cyberbully sometimes has to go underground to perform his unMasonic acts of disparaging another Mason’s good name and efforts. Another favorite tool of the cyberbully is using a pseudonym. Now I know there are perhaps some good reasons for using a hidden name; like, perhaps he or she is a public figure, etc. However, in the rare case a Mason must hide his name, he should be careful when attacking another person who is using his given name. If your argument is valid and is to be respected by others, put your given name to your comment, or do not comment at all. It is truly unfair to attack another Mason by hiding under the veil of a pseudonym. Pike wrote that the actions of man, which are public, cannot be concealed, “Nothing is more usual than to pretend conscience in all the actions of man which are public and cannot be concealed” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 111).

15. Do Not Attack Any Religion, Religious Organization Or Religious Opinion:

Again, I have to ask, for those Postmodern Masons who willfully attack religion, a religious order or a religious viewpoint, did they not learn anything from their Masonic lessons? I have witnessed this behavior from time to time, where a Mason feels it is OK to attack the Vatican or some evangelical order because they spoke-out against Freemasonry. If I attacked every person who spoke out against Freemasonry, I would have no friends or family left, seriously. But more importantly, nothing is ever gained by attacking a religion or religious viewpoints; in fact, sadly you maybe hurting the feelings of a Masonic brother (or sister) who is of that faith, which drives a wedge between you and that person. In the end, nothing is ever truly gained by publicly attacking religion. Pike wrote, “Love clasps the hand of love, amid all the envyings and distractions of showy competition,” and “bitter or revengeful feelings, contempt, dislike, hatred… are intruders and not welcome:”

Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion. For here are inculcated disinterestedness, affection, toleration, devotedness, patriotism, truth, a generous sympathy with those who suffer and mourn, pity for the fallen, mercy for the erring, relief for those in want, Faith, Hope, and .Charity. Here we meet as brethren, to learn to know and love each other. Here we greet each other gladly, are lenient to each other’s faults, regardful of each other’s feelings, ready to relieve each other’s wants. This is the true religion revealed to the ancient patriarchs; which Masonry has taught for many centuries, and which it will continue to teach as long as time endures. If unworthy passions, or selfish, bitter, or revengeful feelings, contempt, dislike, hatred, enter here, they are intruders and not welcome, strangers uninvited, and not guests.

Certainly there are many evils and bad passions, and much hate and contempt and unkindness everywhere in the world. We cannot refuse to see the evil that is in life. But all is not evil. We still see God in the world. There is good amidst the evil. The hand of mercy leads wealth to the hovels of poverty and sorrow. Truth and simplicity live amid many wiles and sophistries. There are good hearts underneath gay robes, and under tattered garments also. Love clasps the hand of love, amid all the envyings and distractions of showy competition (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 213-214).

And again, Pike wrote, “To respect all forms of worship, to tolerate all political and religious opinions; not to blame, and still less to condemn the religion of others: not to seek to make converts; but to be content if they have the religion of Socrates; a veneration for the Creator, the religion of good works, and grateful acknowledgment of God’s blessings” (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 333). There you have it, let us be content that we have the religion of good works and God’s blessings, which we most assuredly lose when we attack another person’s religion or religious viewpoints.

With all that said, please, go online, but be careful; and by all means, continue to enjoy your online Masonic community experience, for there is still yet much more to learn. Yet, in that rare occasion a Postmodern Mason acts unMasonic, you now have some tools to help you decide how to respond, or not to respond.

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir


Why Are We Encouraged To Explore Divinity Within Freemasonry If The Craft Is Not A Religion?


This article will be my fifth submission on the topic of Postmodernism and its negative effects on the Craft. Here is a list of the other four:

  1. Jan 1, 2016: Postmodernism And Its Devastating Effect On Freemasonry
  2. Feb 1, 2016: Characteristics of a Postmodern Freemason
  3. March 1, 2016: Spiritual Anarchy and Freemasonry
  4. April 1, 2016:Why Does Freemasonry Conceal Its Secrets From Even Its Own Members?

I am often puzzled by the statement that Freemasonry is not a religion; for you see, I have read countless accounts where some of our greatest authors claimed otherwise. But before I delve into specifics, let’s first define what religion means; I say this only because most people don’t even understand how the word is defined. Here is a great definition for the word:

Religion (from O.Fr. religion ‘religious community,’ from L. religionem (nom. religio) ‘respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods,’ ‘obligation, the bond between man and the gods’ is derived from the Latin religiō, the ultimate origins of which are obscure… Religion is a cultural system of behaviors and practices, mythologies, world views, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and societal organisation that relate humanity to what an anthropologist has called ‘an order of existence’… Religions have sacred histories and narratives, which may be preserved in sacred scriptures, and symbols and holy places, that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe.

I know, some readers of this post will immediately dismiss this definition. You see, our cultural conditioning has predetermined our path of thinking, “Within Postmodernism, we are taught to dismiss any teaching of religion; that religion has no place in a secular society.” However, let’s breakdown the above definition before specifically discussing its effect on Freemasonry.

So what is religion? Well from the above definition, the origin of the word religion is a “respect for what is sacred, reverence for God.” The word sacred can be defined as “devoted or dedicated to a deity;” and God can be defined as “the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.” Therefore, when we are discussing the word religion, we are talking about something that is of the sacredness of God, not a body or an institutional organization per say. Yes, such beliefs have morphed themselves into beliefs systems that have become known as religious organizations; but that does not negate its original meaning, which is nothing but a “reverence for God.”

Therefore, when Albert Pike mentioned the word religion, was he talking about religion in the original sense, the contemporary sense, or something in between? To answer this question, let us take a closer look at his profound words from Chapter VIII of Morals and Dogma (1871), pages 212-214; I interjected my interpreted comments between each paragraph to better relate Pike’s meaning:

For there is a religion of toil. It is not all drudgery, a mere stretching of the limbs and straining of the sinews to tasks. It has a meaning and an intent. A living heart pours life-blood into the toiling arm; and warm affections inspire and mingle with man’s labors. They are the home affections. Labor toils a field, or plies its task in cities, or urges the keels of commerce over wide oceans; but home is its centre; and thither it ever goes with its earnings, with the means of support and comfort for others; offerings sacred to the thought of every true man, as a sacrifice at a golden shrine. Many faults there are amidst the toils of life; many harsh and hasty words are uttered; but still the toils go on, weary and hard and exasperating as they often are. For in that home is age or sickness, or helpless infancy, or gentle childhood, or feeble woman, that must not want. If man had no other than mere selfish impulses, the scene of labor which we behold around us would not exist.

Comment: Here we see Pike discussing the toil of religion, or the work/study of religion. I must emphasis that Pike never mentioned any specific religious organization, which means he meant something else, like perhaps the benefits a man might receive from the study of religion.

The advocate who fairly and honestly presents his case, with a feeling of true self-respect, honor, and conscience, to help the tribunal on towards the right conclusion, with a conviction that God’s justice reigns there, is acting a religious part, leading that day a religious life; or else right and justice are no part of religion. Whether, during all that day, he has once appealed, in form or in terms, to his conscience, or not; whether he has once spoken of religion and God, or not; if there has been the inward purpose, the conscious intent and desire, that sacred justice should triumph, he has that day led a good and religious life, and made a most essential contribution to that religion of life and of society, the cause of equity between man and man, and of truth and right action in the world.

Comment: Pike now mentions an advocate who is making his case; as opposed to a particular doctrine, which comes from religious bodies and organizations. And that the advocate would begin to act according to the belief he spoke of, which would change his life and society.


Books, to be of religious tendency in the Masonic sense, need not be books of sermons, of pious exercises, or of prayers. Whatever inculcates pure, noble, and patriotic sentiments, or touches the heart with the beauty of virtue, and the excellence of an up-right life, accords with the religion of Masonry, and is the Gospel of literature and art. That Gospel is preached from many a book and painting, from many a poem and fiction, and review and newspaper; and it is a painful error and miserable narrowness, not to recognize these wide-spread agencies of Heaven’s providing; not to see and welcome these many-handed coadjutors, to the great and good cause. The oracles of God do not speak from the pulpit alone.

Comment: Now we read Pike making a distinction between Masonry and central religious tenancies, i.e. Churches. That Masonry’s religion should not be based on sermons, prayers or pious exercises; rather, our religion is based on the “beauty of virtue” and an “up-right life.”

There is also a religion of society. In business, there is much more than sale, exchange, price, payment; for there is the sacred faith of man in man. When we repose perfect confidence in the integrity of another; when we feel that he will not swerve from the right, frank, straightforward, conscientious course, for any temptation; his integrity and conscientiousness are the image of God to us; and when we believe in it, it is as great and generous an act, as when we believe in the rectitude of the Deity.

Comment: Now he writes that there is a religion of society; that our own daily actions in business and life are based on God, i.e. Religion. Again, Pike is not talking about an organizational body.

In gay assemblies for amusement, the good affections of life gush and mingle. If they did not, these gathering places would be as dreary and repulsive as the caves and dens of outlaws and robbers. When friends meet, and hands are warmly pressed, and the eye kindles and the countenance is suffused with gladness, there is a religion between their hearts; and each loves and worships the True and Good that is in the other. It is not policy, or self-interest, or selfishness that spreads such a charm around that meeting, but the halo of bright and beautiful affection.

Comment: “When friends meet… there is a religion” that exist between them; that there is love and goodness, and a worship, which links one to another. Again, there is no mention of an organizational body, just people loving the company of another – this is a religion.

The same splendor of kindly liking, and affectionate regard, shines like the soft overarching sky, over all the world; over all places where men meet, and walk or toil together; not over lovers’ bowers and marriage altars alone, not over the homes of purity and tenderness alone; but over all tilled fields, and busy workshops, and dusty highways, and paved streets. There is not a worn stone upon the sidewalks, but has been the altar of such offerings of mutual kindness; nor a wooden pillar or iron railing against which hearts beating with affection have not leaned. How many soever other elements there are in the stream of life flowing through these channels, that is surely here and everywhere; honest, heartfelt, disinterested, inexpressible affection.

Comment: Pike wrote that this “same splendor” is in the world; wherever people meet, work and toil together there is religion.

Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion. For here are inculcated disinterestedness, affection, toleration, devotedness, patriotism, truth, a generous sympathy with those who suffer and mourn, pity for the fallen, mercy for the erring, relief for those in want, Faith, Hope, and .Charity. Here we meet as brethren, to learn to know and love each other. Here we greet each other gladly, are lenient to each other’s faults, regardful of each other’s feelings, ready to relieve each other’s wants. This is the true religion revealed to the ancient patriarchs; which Masonry has taught for many centuries, and which it will continue to teach as long as time endures. If unworthy passions, or selfish, bitter, or revengeful feelings, contempt, dislike, hatred, enter here, they are intruders and not welcome, strangers uninvited, and not guests ( Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 212).

Comment: And now the finale, therefore, “every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion, and its teachings are instruction in religion.” You see, Masonry “is the true religion,” which had been “revealed to the ancient patriarchs.” And it will continue to “teach as long as time endures.”

I know, I know, you might be saying again that Masonry is not a religion, and in this sense I agree – Masonry is not a religion in the contemporary sense. No, Masonry is a religion in the ancient sense. Nevertheless, it is still a religion. It does not matter that contemporary religions have altered its usage and made a mockery of the word, the word religion still retains its original meaning if one only wants to take the time to study it meaning!

Pike also commented that Masonry had always “religiously preserved that enlightened faith;” that it has always been because of “religion and philosophy,” and that many of the religions of the past “enfeebled the religious spirit:”

Masonry has in all times religiously preserved that enlightened faith from which flow sublime Devotedness, the sentiment of Fraternity fruitful of good works, the spirit of indulgence and peace, of sweet hopes and effectual consolations; and inflexibility in the accomplishment of the most painful and arduous duties. It has always propagated it with ardor and perseverance; and therefore it labors at the present day more zealously than ever. Scarcely a Masonic discourse is pronounced, that does not demonstrate the necessity and advantages of this faith, and especially recall the two constitutive principles of religion, that make all religion,–love of God, and love of neighbor. Masons carry these principles into the bosoms of their families and of society. While the Sectarians of former times enfeebled the religious spirit, Masonry, forming one great People over the whole globe, and march under the great banner of Charity and Benevolence, preserves feeling, strengthens it, extends it in its purity and simplicity, as it has always existed in the depths of the human heart, as it existed even under the dominion of the most ancient forms of worship, but where gross and debasing superstitions forbade its recognition.

A Masonic Lodge should resemble a bee-hive, in which all the members work together with ardor for the common good. Masonry is not made for cold souls and narrow minds, that do not comprehend its lofty mission and sublime apostolate. Here the anathema against lukewarm souls applies. To comfort misfortune, to popularize knowledge, to teach whatever is true and pure in religion and philosophy, to accustom men to respect order and the proprieties of life, to point out the way to genuine happiness, to prepare for that fortunate period, when all the factions of the Human Family, united by the bonds of Toleration and Fraternity, shall be but one household,–these are labors that may well excite zeal and even enthusiasm (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 137).

Yes, many people still think religion and philosophy are separate; however, they are in fact not. In truth, the basis of religion is philosophy, something Masonry has maintained:

Nevertheless, Masonry, which is Morality and Philosophy, must not cease to do its duty. We never know at what moment success awaits our efforts–generally when most unexpected–nor with what effect our efforts are or are not to be attended. Succeed or fail, Masonry must not bow to error, or succumb under discouragement. There were at Rome a few Carthaginian soldiers, taken prisoners, who refused to bow to Flaminius, and had a little of Hannibal’s magnanimity. Masons should possess an equal greatness of soul. Masonry should be an energy; finding its aim and effect in the amelioration of mankind. Socrates should enter into Adam, and produce Marcus Aurelius, in other words, bring forth from the man of enjoyments, the man of wisdom. Masonry should not be a mere watch-tower, built upon mystery, from which to gaze at ease upon the world, with no other result than to be a convenience for the curious. To hold the full cup of thought to the thirsty lips of men; to give to all the true ideas of Deity; to harmonize conscience and science, are the province of Philosophy. Morality is Faith in full bloom. Contemplation should lead to action, and the absolute be practical; the ideal be made air and food and drink to the human mind. Wisdom is a sacred communion. It is only on that condition that it ceases to be a sterile love of Science, and becomes the one and supreme method by which to unite Humanity and arouse it to concerted action. Then Philosophy becomes Religion ( Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 20).

I realize this information is perhaps new to many readers of this blog; nevertheless, it must be revealed to you now, during this critical juncture in Masonic history. Like so many things, Pike actually warned the Craft back in 1871 that this day would come; that we would divide the Craft based on these two areas, Religion and Philosophy:

We may be sure that so soon as Religion and Philosophy become distinct departments, the mental activity of the age is in advance of its Faith; and that, though habit may sustain the latter for a time, its vitality is gone (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 731).

Again, Pike warned that Religion and Philosophy would become distinctly separate. We can see it every time a member of the Craft states that we are not a religion, when in fact, in a historical sense, we are.

You see, this is all apart of the subject I have been writing about since January – YES, the pesky topic of Postmodernism. Feel free to link to other articles for further information on the topic; which has been linked above for your convenience.  In short, Postmodernism has been a failed experiment. As hard as contemporary scholars have tried to separate society from seeking Divinity, it has not worked. Of course it worked for the people who always succumb to the whims of the moment; but for those who are seeking a higher calling than immediate social gratification, Postmodernism has only been a temporary obstacle to true Enlightenment.

In conclusion, in your authors humble option, Indeed, Masonry is the original primitive religion; however, it is not a religion in the contemporary sense, let’s make a distinction. Pike wrote the “Masonry is not a religion…” and yet he wrote that “Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion” above:

But Masonry teaches, and has preserved in their purity, the cardinal tenets of the old primitive faith, which underlie and are the foundation of all religions. All that ever existed have had a basis of truth; and all have overlaid that truth with errors. The primitive truths taught by the Redeemer were sooner corrupted, and intermingled and alloyed with fictions than when taught to the first of our race. Masonry is the universal morality which is suitable to the inhabitants of every clime, to the man of every creed. It has taught no doctrines, except those truths that tend directly to the well-being of man; and those who have attempted to direct it toward useless vengeance, political ends, and Jesuitism, have merely perverted it to purposes foreign to its pure spirit and real nature (Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871, p. 161).

You see, despite the fact that Freemasonry is not a contemporary religion, we are still obligated, as Masons, to seek Divinity and Masonic religion in our own way; therefore, never let any Postmodern thinking tell you otherwise!

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir


Why Does Freemasonry Conceal Its Secrets From Even Its Own Members?


As mentioned in my previous article Spiritual Anarchy and Freemasonry, “Upon reflection, our declining numbers is nothing but the symptom of a disease that we allowed to infiltrate the Craft, i.e. Postmodernism.” Our Masonic forefathers warned us to be on guard against the Profane, but we have not listened. Instead, we have allowed Profane thinking into the Craft; nevertheless, this was to be expected, as it has throughout the history of mankind.

You see, the Craft is a pathway to elevated levels of learning, which requires a depth of study in order to understand its teachings. No, I am not talking about someone who earned a position within the Craft because of his association and length of service. As honorable as a Mason’s service to the Craft is, in the end, his service to the Craft often has little to do with one’s Masonic knowledge. Case in point, Albert Pike wrote in his book Morals and Dogma (1871), “As all the great Mysteries of God and the Universe are thus hidden in the Ternary, it everywhere appears in Masonry and in the Hermetic Philosophy under its mask of Alchemy. It even appears where Masons do not suspect it” (p. 791-792). Wait a minute, is Pike suggesting that Freemasonry does not reveal all it secrets to the newly initiated? Yes, of course. Pike confirmed this concealment when he wrote:

“If you have been disappointed in the first three Degrees, as you have received them, and if it has seemed to you that the performance has not come up to the promise, that the lessons of morality are not new, and the scientific instruction is but rudimentary, and the symbols are imperfectly explained, remember that the ceremonies and lessons of those Degrees have been for ages more and more accommodating themselves, by curtailment and sinking into commonplace, to the often limited memory and capacity of the Master and Instructor, and to the intellect and needs of the Pupil and Initiate; that they have come to us from an age when symbols were used, not to reveal but to conceal; when the commonest learning was confined to a select few, and the simplest principles of morality seemed newly discovered truths; and that these antique and simple Degrees now stand like the broken columns of a roofless Druidic temple, in their rude and mutilated greatness; in many parts, also, corrupted by time, and disfigured by modern additions and absurd interpretations. They are but the entrance to the great Masonic Temple, the triple columns of the portico” (p. 106).

Yes my friends, Pike wrote that Masonry would be “corrupted by time, and disfigured by modern additions,” and that our symbols were meant to conceal, not reveal deeper meanings to everyone. Now, keep in mind, Pike was not merely talking about the first three degrees of Freemasonry; no, he was alluding to all the degrees within the Craft. He firmly believed that Masonic symbols and ceremonies had more than one meaning; that they were intended to be hidden; not fully disclosed. Why? Simply stated, he, like others before him, knew the Craft would be infiltrated; but more on that a little later. Here we read Pike discussing the secrets:

“These Degrees are also intended to teach more than morals. The symbols and ceremonies of Masonry have more than one meaning. They rather conceal than disclose the Truth. They hint it only, at least; and their varied meanings are only to be discovered by reflection and study. Truth is not only symbolized by Light, but as the ray of light is separable into rays of different colors, so is truth separable into kinds.” (p. 148).

Think about it for a moment, history is replete with examples of good ideas that eventually become corrupted; which Pike confirmed, “Unfortunately, as Truths always become perverted into falsehoods, and are falsehoods when misapplied, this Truth became the Gospel of Anarchy, soon after it was first preached. Masonry early comprehended this Truth, and recognized its own enlarged duties…” and “felt that this Truth had the Omnipotence of God on its side” (p. 24).


I know, I know, there is that pesky word again, God. You see, so many within the Craft today have been taught that Freemasonry has nothing to do with religion; therefore, they dismiss any relationship to the word God. Nevertheless, “God and truth are inseparable; a knowledge of God is possession of the saving oracles of truth” (p. 713). This infiltration in thinking was to be expected, for you see, men of all ages act the same, which Pike confirmed:

“A man may be a good sort of man in general, and yet a very bad man in particular: good in the Lodge and bad in the world; good in public, and bad in his family; good at home, and bad on a journey or in a strange city. Many a man earnestly desires to be a good Mason. He says so, and is sincere. But if you require him to resist a certain passion, to sacrifice a certain indulgence, to control his appetite at a particular feast, or to keep his temper in a dispute, you will find that he does not wish to be a good Mason, in that particular case; or, wishing, is not able to resist his worse impulses” (p. 151).

I know, I know, Masons don’t like to discuss the fact that evil may have in fact infiltrated our distinguished institutions; or that we are suppose to be on guard against the evil Mason. But honestly, one only needs to look at our writings to discover the fact that we were forewarned, as Pike wrote, “The true Mason loves not only his kindred and his country, but all mankind; not only the good, but also the evil, among his brethren.” I could easily go on and on with regard to the topic of the evil Mason, but I won’t. I will however mention that I wrote a four hundred page book called Masonry and the Three Little Pigs (2015) that covered this topic in length. Therefore, I am very familiar with the topic of evil infiltration within the Craft.

In conclusion, this was the fourth article written this year on the topic of Postmodernism and its negative effect on the Craft; and it will not be my last. In the article, I discussed why we have to keep our most valued secrets within elevated levels of learning. In short, to keep them from the profane. Honestly, until one understands the importance of these true secrets, he will continue to wonder and ponder like the Postmodern thinkers of destruction and ruin. Here are a few departing words from Eliphas Levi, the man who most influenced Pike:

The man who is enslaved by his passions or worldly prejudices can in no wise be initiated; he must alter or he will never attain; hence he cannot be an adept, for the word signifies a person who has attained by will and by work. The man who loves his own opinions and fears to part with them, who suspects new truths, who is unprepared to doubt everything rather than admit anything on chance, should close this book; for him it is useless and dangerous; he will fail to understand it, and it will trouble him, while if he should divine its meaning, it will be a still greater source of disquietude. If you hold by anything in the world more than by reason, truth,and justice; if your will be uncertain and vacillating, either in good or evil; if logic alarm you, or the naked truth make you blush; if you are hurt when accepted errors are assailed; condemn this work straight away; do not read it; let it cease to exist for you; but at the same time do not cry it down as dangerous. The secrets which it records will be understood by an elect few, and will be held back by those who understand them. (Eliphas Levi, Transcendental Magic, 1854, p. 28-29).

So Mote It Be!

Hank Kraychir


Spiritual Anarchy and Freemasonry


This is my third article on the topic of Postmodernism and its devastating effect on the Craft. If you haven’t been following this series of articles, I recommend you read “Postmodernism and its Devastating Effect on Freemasonry” and “Characteristics of a Postmodern Freemason” before reading this article. Otherwise many of the points I make will not make as much sense.

Albert Pike perhaps said it best when he wrote, “What, in fact, is a despot, spiritual or temporal, but a crowned anarchist?” Of course this could be interpreted differently, but I see it as a spiritual battle. Let me explain further.

After some study and reflection, I discovered a connection between the words Anarchist and Antichrist; and this connection is widely used by our popular culture today. Case in point, check out this song by the Sex Pistols, its called “Anarchy In The UK.”

Please read the lyrics carefully. Can you see the correlation between Anarchy and Antichrist:

Lyrics to the song “Anarchy In The UK:”

Right now ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
I am an anti-Christ
I am an anarchist,
Don’t know what I want
But I know how to get it
I want to destroy the passerby
‘Cause I want to be anarchy,
No dogs body
Anarchy for the U.K.
It’s coming sometime and maybe
I give a wrong time, stop a traffic line.
Your future dream is a shopping scheme
‘Cause I want to be anarchy,
In the city
How many ways to get what you want
I use the best, I use the rest
I use the enemy.
I use anarchy
‘Cause I want to be anarchy,
Its the only way to be
Is this the MPLA
Or is this the UDA
Or is this the IRA
I thought it was the U.K.
Or just another country
Another council tenancy.
I want to be anarchy
And I want to be anarchy
(Oh what a name)
And I want to be an anarchist
(I get pissed, destroy!)

This popular song is certainly reflective of Postmodern thinking, education and to be honest it’s an obvious effort to program the masses against seeking Divinity; i.e. Postmodernism.

You see, “The word ‘antichrist’ combines two roots: αντί (anti) + Χριστός (Khristos). ‘Αντί’ can mean not only ‘against’ and ‘opposite of,’ but also ‘in place of.’ “Χριστός”, translated ‘Christ,’ is Greek for the Hebrew ‘Messiah.’ Both ‘Christ’ and ‘Messiah’ literally mean ‘Anointed One.” Whereas, Anarchy can be defined as “the condition of a society, entity, group of people or a single person which does not recognize authority.” In short, both definitions are one in the same; Antichrist is against the anointed or the one chosen, just like Anarchy means not recognizing authority.

I wrote in my article “Postmodernism and its Devastating Effect on Freemasonry” that Postmodernism can be defined as:

a late-20th-century movement in the arts, architecture, and criticism that was a departure from modernism. Postmodernism includes skeptical interpretations of culture, literature, art, philosophy, history, economics, architecture, fiction, and literary criticism.’ Better yet, “it can be described as a set of critical, strategic and rhetorical practices employing concepts such as difference, repetition, the trace, the simulacrum, and hyperreality to destabilize other concepts such as presence, identity, historical progress, epistemic certainty, and the univocity of meaning.’ Did you catch that? In short, Postmodernism ‘can be described as a set of critical, strategic and rhetorical practices… to destabilize concepts such as presence, identity, historical progress.’ This destructive thought process is all part of an academic effort to destroy ‘Traditionalism, which can be defined as, ‘Adherence to tradition, especially in cultural or religious practice,’ or ‘A system holding that all knowledge is derived from original divine revelation and is transmitted by tradition,’ like that of Freemasonry.”

You see, Freemasonry teaches the opposite of Anarchy. Nevertheless, we have within our ranks those who espouse the tenets of Postmodernism, which is nothing but Anarchy disguised as new and fresh ideas. These agents of change use terms like progressiveness, needed reforms and modernism. I hear it all the time, we need to change and update our appearance and views in order to attract the youth. Sadly, many within the Craft accept these comments as fact and go along to get ahead. But when we allow such behavior to occur, we are actually diluting our message and ultimate value.


Whereas, Albert Pike instructed us to be on the watch for such novel ideas. In fact, he used the two words Anarchist and Anarchy at least nine times in his book Morals and Dogma (1871), like when he wrote, “There is no evil that is not preferable to Anarchy” (1871, p. 97). Did you catch that? Pike wrote that evil itself is preferable to Anarchy. For you see, truth itself can become perverted, “Unfortunately, as Truths always become perverted into falsehoods, and are falsehoods when misapplied, this Truth become the Gospel of Anarchy, soon after it was first preached” (p. 24).

Freemasonry teaches structure, not Anarchy; social cohesion, not disorder:

“Society, in its great relations, is as much the creation of Heaven as is the system of the Universe. If that bond of gravitation that holds all worlds and systems together, were suddenly severed, the universe would fly into wild and boundless chaos. And if we were to sever all the moral bonds that hold society together; if we could cut off from it every conviction of Truth and Integrity, of an authority above it, and of a conscience within it, it would immediately rush to disorder and frightful anarchy and ruin. The religion we teach is therefore as really a principle of things, and as certain and true, as gravitation” (p. 196-197).

We do not side with a political party or a religious sect; no, we side with the moral authority of governance:

“Masonry, not in anywise derogating from the differing duties which the diversity of states requires, tends to create a new people, which, composed of men of many nations and tongues, shall all be bound together by the bonds of science, morality, and virtue. Essentially philanthropic, philosophical, and progressive, it has for the basis of its dogma a firm belief in the existence of God and his providence, and of the immortality of the soul; for its object, the dissemination of moral, political, philosophical, and religious truth, and the practice of all the virtues. In every age, its device has been, ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,’ with constitutional government, law, order, discipline, and subordination to legitimate authority–government and not anarchy” (p. 220).

Furthermore, as Pike wrote earlier, “What, in fact, is a despot, spiritual or temporal, but a crowned anarchist,” so to did Eliphas Levi confirm, “Those two blood-hungered monsters, despotism and anarchy, will tear themselves to pieces, and annihilate each other, after having mutually sustained each other for a little while, by the embrace of their struggle itself (The Key of the Mysteries, 1861, p. 31).

Unfortunately, there exist,

“men who wish to realize salvation by faith alone, because charity escapes them, and who can no longer realize it, even upon the earth, for their pretended sacraments are no longer anything but allegorical mummeries; they no longer give grace; they no longer make God seen and touched; they are no longer, in a word, the signs of the almighty power of faith, but the compelled witnesses of the eternal impotence of doubt” (Eliphas Levi, The Key of the Mysteries, 1861, p. 42).

How often are we told that Freemasonry is not at all religious, despite the fact many of our greatest Masonic authors proclaim otherwise; like that of Albert Pike:

“Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion. For here are inculcated disinterestedness, affection, toleration, devotedness, patriotism, truth, a generous sympathy with those who suffer and mourn, pity for the fallen, mercy for the erring, relief for those in want, Faith, Hope, and .Charity. Here we meet as brethren, to learn to know and love each other. Here we greet each other gladly, are lenient to each other’s faults, regardful of each other’s feelings, ready to relieve each other’s wants. This is the true religion revealed to the ancient patriarchs; which Masonry has taught for many centuries, and which it will continue to teach as long as time endures. If unworthy passions, or selfish, bitter, or revengeful feelings, contempt, dislike, hatred, enter here, they are intruders and not welcome, strangers uninvited, and not guests” (Albert Pike, M0rals and Dogma, 1871, p. 213-214).

Albert Mackey wrote in his book An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and its Kindred Sciences that “Masonry may rightfully claim to be called a religious institution” (1912, p. 618). Furthermore,  Joseph Moody also claimed in his book, The Origin of Free-Masonry (1852), that Freemasonry was formed as a religion, “We have, we think, successfully proved, and we have abundant authority for the same, that, Freemasonry in its origin was religious, and this principle serves as a faithful guide to its condition and history throughout all its ramifications, and by whatever name it may have been designated” (p. 44).

Think about it, the biggest Postmodern hoax committed by the Craft has been against itself; and that is the belief that we are simply a fraternal organization, with no religious components or tendencies, which has lowered our value substantially. Oh! How have we been deceived! Where did such ideas originate? Surely, not from our own history, which tells a different story. One only needs to follow the allegorical path established within our own symbols and rituals to find religion, or as Pike wrote above, “This is the true religion revealed to the ancient patriarchs; which Masonry has taught for many centuries.”

In conclusion, before we can truly realize any sustainable growth, and a true cultural value again, we must first analyze what we have done to ourselves. Upon reflection, our declining numbers is nothing but the symptom of a disease that we allowed to infiltrate the Craft, i.e. Postmodernism; but more on that next month!

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir


PS: Think about it, the Craft hides the truth from its own initiates, and why do we do it. It’s obvious, to hide our secrets from the PROFANE!  Yes, even those Despots who have infiltrated the Craft and dismiss our true value and history. So before you dismiss the religious components within Freemasonry, reflect! Or as Eliphas Levi wrote, “TO KNOW, TO DARE, TO WILL, TO KEEP SILENT.” Here are a couple allegorical songs to end with and reflect upon; simply listen to the words and relate them allegorically to the lies we tell initiates and the general public, and why we do it and its necessity, which has led to a division with the Craft. Again, more on that next month.



Characteristics of a Postmodern Freemason.

Postmodern Freemason

After writing my last article, Postmodernism And Its Devastating Effect On Freemasonry, I received a great many questions about Postmodernism. In fact, I started using the terms “Postmodern Mason” and “Postmodern Freemason” in many of my responses, which led to even more questions about the terms. Apparently they have never been used within the Craft to distinguish a type of thinking before.

As a response to so many questions and interest into the topic of a “Postmodern Freemason,” I have decided to write this corresponding article. Now, before I delve into specifics, let me just say that everyone has Postmodern tendencies; some more than others, as will become evident. But first, let’s learn a little more about the term Postmodernism, which can be defined,

Postmodernism is a late-20th-century movement in the arts, architecture, and criticism that was a departure from modernism. Postmodernism includes skeptical interpretations of culture, literature, art, philosophy, history, economics, architecture, fiction, and literary criticism. It is often associated with deconstruction and post-structuralism because its usage as a term gained significant popularity at the same time as twentieth-century post-structural thought.

The term postmodernism has been applied to a host of movements, mainly in art, music, and literature, that reacted against tendencies in modernism, and are typically marked by revival of historical elements and techniques.

With that said, despite it’s once perceived popularity, Postmodernism has come under criticism by many in the academic world,

Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, including the assertions that postmodernism is meaningless and promotes obscurantism. For example, Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge. He asks why postmodernist intellectuals do not respond like people in other fields when asked, “what are the principles of their theories, on what evidence are they based, what do they explain that wasn’t already obvious, etc.?…If [these requests] can’t be met, then I’d suggest recourse to Hume’s advice in similar circumstances: ‘to the flames’.” Christian apologist William Lane Craig has noted “The idea that we live in a postmodern culture is a myth. In fact, a postmodern culture is an impossibility; it would be utterly unliveable. People are not relativistic when it comes to matters of science, engineering, and technology; rather, they are relativistic and pluralistic in matters of religion and ethics. But, of course, that’s not postmodernism; that’s modernism!”… However, as for continental philosophy, American academics have tended to label it “postmodernist”, especially practitioners of “French Theory”. Such a trend might derive from U.S. departments of Comparative Literature… Philosopher Daniel Dennett declared, “Postmodernism, the school of ‘thought’ that proclaimed ‘There are no truths, only interpretations’ has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for ‘conversations’ in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster.”

Did you catch that? Here it is again, “There are no truths, only interpretations’ has largely played itself out in absurdity, but it has left behind a generation of academics in the humanities disabled by their distrust of the very idea of truth and their disrespect for evidence, settling for ‘conversations’ in which nobody is wrong and nothing can be confirmed, only asserted with whatever style you can muster.”


How often, especially of Facebook, are we confronted with fellow Masons who only want to argue, and even when a question has been answered, they simply switch to other points to argue a belief is wrong. Honestly, it happens all the time. This is the Postmodern Freemason in action.

I was recently told that debate and discussion were necessary components of learning. To which my response was no they are not; rather, they are just another set of tools, or a hook if you will, to help a student retain information. Case in point, I read Pike’s book Morals and Dogma (1871) daily, and I follow this reading with a short post on Pikequotes blog. In essence, I am learning every day, yet I have no discussion or debate with Pike about his writings. You see, you can learn without discussion or debate. Just read a book; something many people have forgotten how to do, like so many traditional things today.

Yet, as an college instructor, I do use discussion and debate to help students better understand a point. Nevertheless, sadly, many people, including Postmodern teachers, have stretched this idea to all types of learning; as though this is the only way a person can learn, which is sheer nonsense. So, did you ever wonder why social media is filled with Postmodern thinking and responses; well, here you have one of the principles reasons why. Our schools have been filled with academics who think nothing about allowing such behavior, and in fact encourage it. I see it all the time. Students are encouraged to respond to ideas and issues without ever studying them. And when they do conduct some research, it’s normally limited to the first few hits on Google. Which is followed by other Postmodernist who blabber their nonsensical opinions about a traditional viewpoint. Well, guess what? People are finally catching on to this foolish play on words, and are starting to fight back.

After a great deal of reflection, here are my thoughts and opinions about spotting the Postmodern Freemason who would rather argue, debate and start a discussion with the intent of attacking traditional Freemasonry and those who support such thinking, etc, instead of becoming a student of the mysteries:

  1. Rhetorical debate to divide and destroy – The Postmodern Freemason seeks to debate and uses rhetoric in order to create havoc. It is a simple but effective plan for internal division within the Craft.
  2. There are no conclusive facts – the Postmodern Freemason deems the concept of truth as an artificial illusion, altered by people and special interest to achieve dominance over others; a tactic they use aggressively to counter traditionalism.
  3. Facts and fault are identical – the Postmodern Freemason maintains that facts are too restrictive to conclude anything. In short, what is fact today can be false in the future.
  4. Would rather rely on other Postmodernist thought than rely on tradition – The Postmodern Freemason often rejects conventional (traditional) judgment and impartiality; preferring instead to rely on the judgments of others as a guide, rather than accept historical facts, truths and traditions.
  5. Traditionalism is incorrect and dishonest – the Postmodern Freemason protests against the limitations of religious secular power and moral development. In short, they are conducting an intellectual war towards traditional institutions and traditional thinking. Instead of trying to understand that most of these organizations actually have been infiltrated by supporters of the mysteries, they make enemies of them.
  6. Traditionalism is exclusion – The Postmodern Freemason claims that cooperative possession is better than individualism, which they believe is a process of traditional exclusion.
  7. Cynicism with modernism – The Postmodern Freemason is always asking more from the unfulfilled promises of religion, government, science and technology.
  8. Morality is personal – The Postmodern Freemason believes morality to be of one’s own personal opinion. He often lowers the ideals of morality to one’s own personal private code of ethics devoid of traditional standards and long held established rules of conduct.
  9. Globalization is better than nationalism – the Postmodern Freemason claims that national boundaries are a hindrance to human potential, trade and the final uniting of the people of the world. Nationalism, they think, instigates conflict. Consequently, the Postmodernist Freemason frequently suggest the concepts of internationalism, and the uniting of countries through trade agreements as a first step towards this aim; disavowing our own long standing tradition to support one’s National Government.
  10. Freemasonry holds ideals from all religions – The Postmodern Freemason often denounces the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ or Muhammad as being the only way to God; preferring new age religions. Again, never understanding that many of the mysteries are held within both of these religions. In fact, the traditions of Freemasonry predates these religions, and uphold the traditions of religions that no longer exist.
  11. Defend feminists and homosexuals – Postmodern Freemasons often defend the causes of feminists and homosexuals over traditionalism, not understanding that such beliefs and behaviors are actually apart of the mysteries. Somehow many in the Craft have come to see these two issues as separate, when in fact they are not. Gender and sexual relations are in fact an essential part of the lessons of the mysteries.
  12. Environmentalism is the solution – Postmodern Freemasons blame Western society for the destruction of the environment; this is like saying we must throw out the baby with the bathwater because the water is bad.

Therefore, as can be read above, many people hold Postmodern views on particular issues, including myself. Before studying Pike’s book Morals and Dogma (1871), I too conducted my behavior according my Postmodern training; I would be a hypocrite to say otherwise.

It is clear however, especially after studying the mysteries, that we, as a culture, have become confused by such thinking. Postmodern thinking is meant to destroy rather than educate and unite. The lines between Analytical thinking and Postmodern thinking have become blurred. Yes, let us analysis, there is nothing wrong with analyzing Freemasonry; but the problem begins when we use only our Postmodern training and conditioning to destroy rather than understand. In short, “the more I learn, the less I really know,” is a better attitude than “I know better than our traditions and history.”

So Mote It Be!!!

Hank Kraychir